assignments used in the graduate course in chemical reaction engineering at the University of Michigan for the past 20 years has been an in-depth analysis and critique of a journal article related to the course material. All challenges by students of ideas and conclusions of the articles must be supported by calculation or pertinent literature. In analyzing and critiquing journal articles, students are asked to identify elements of the article and classify them according to key ideas, key assumptions, key theories, key experiments, and key results. Why are the last data points always off the curve predicted by the theoretical model? Beginning with Chapter 4, a number of the problems at the end of each chapter in this book are based on the students' analyses and critiques of journal articles and are designated with a C (e.g., P4C-1). How will the results or techniques described in this work be useful to other investigators? Can the author's results be explained by another theory or hypothesis?
The heart of the analysis process is the careful comparison of similarities and differences of the elements. Look for increases or decreases between sequential elements in a series. For example, the article analyzed for Problem P4C-1 discusses the effect of pressure on a liquid-phase reaction of the type. Consequently, the first step in analyzing a problem is to identify all the elements of the problem and clarifying them. A B, c The rate equation for the batch reaction was written in terms of the mole fraction of A, y, for an equal molar feed containing an inert. You need to learn if the author's conclusion is supported by the data, if the article is new or novel, if it advances our understanding, and to learn if the analysis is current. What is the novelty or innovation in this work? Students then continue to analyze the article by asking such questions as: What do you believe was the most difficult hurdle for the authors to overcome? When reading the literature, students look for experimental points that fall off the theoretical curve and for statements or equations that are not in a familiar form and do not look quite right. They have been told that they are not required to find an error or inconsistency in the article to receive a good grade, but if they do find such things, it just makes the assignment that much more enjoyable. Significant effort is made to ensure that a cursory or superficial review is not carried out. What is the reason for the distinction?
Essay critiquing system, Journal essay on basketball history, Managing change in the workplace articles / essays,